The Revenue Plan Stress Test underwrites your entire revenue architecture in two conversations. No slide deck required. The output is board-presentable and built from your actual numbers — not benchmarks, not feelings.
You're pre-revenue, at first traction, or about to take a revenue plan into a board meeting — and you want to know exactly where the structural risks are before they materialise.
A single composite score across all 6 underwriting domains — showing you how structurally fragile your current plan is and where the highest-priority fixes are.
Exactly how much pipeline you need versus how much you actually have — in dollars, not percentages. Includes the minimum safe coverage ratio for your specific motion.
A full written analysis of every risk domain — each finding quantified in dollars, with the methodology clearly shown so you can audit every number.
Your win rates, average deal size, and sales cycle assumptions — validated or challenged against the specific motion you're running and the data you actually have.
Where revenue is being lost between signal and close — in the conversion model, the handoff, the CRM data, or the pricing architecture. With dollar estimates.
Whether the unit economics actually support the revenue target — or whether the plan only works if every variable hits simultaneously, which is never the case.
The specific actions to take, in order of financial exposure — so you fix the most expensive structural gaps first rather than the most visible ones.
The same structural failures appear in companies of every size across every market. The Stress Test checks all 6 and quantifies what's at stake in each.
Is your pipeline actually sufficient to hit plan — or does it look sufficient because of how it's being measured?
Are your conversion assumptions realistic, or are you projecting last quarter's win rate onto a different motion?
Does the unit economics model support the revenue target, or does it only work if every assumption hits simultaneously?
Is the data your team uses to make decisions accurate, or is attribution creating a false picture of pipeline health?
Where is revenue being lost between signal and closed — in the conversion model, the handoff, or the pricing architecture?
Is the overall revenue architecture designed to compound, or does it require the same effort each month to sustain?
If we don't identify at least 10× the fee in previously unquantified revenue risk or trapped growth upside within your underwrite, we continue working for up to 30 additional days at no cost. If the threshold still isn't reached, we refund $500.
$997 to underwrite your entire revenue architecture. No slide deck required.